The report, which includes both Medicare and commercial claims data, confirms that the administration of chemotherapy infusion has shifted dramatically from lower-cost physician offices to higher-cost hospital outpatient settings. From 2004 to 2014, the buy-and-bill market share at physician offices dropped from about 90% to about 50%. See the chart below.
Commercial payers’ reimbursement approaches, combined with the 340B Drug Pricing Program, will continue to shrink buy-and-bill volume in physician offices. Unfortunately, these same factors also suggest that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) crazy Medicare Part B experiment will accelerate the shift of drug administration to hospital outpatient facilities.
The Milliman study relies on claims data from (1) a limited data set containing all Medicare-paid claims generated by a sample of Medicare beneficiaries, and (2) the Truven Health Analytics MarketScan Commercial Claims Database. (See pages 26 to 39 of the report for the methodology.) It’s a solid piece of analysis.
The chart below summarizes the volume of chemotherapy infusion claims for both Medicare and commercial payers. As you can see, the share of chemotherapy infusions delivered in physician offices dropped from 84% to 54% in the Medicare population and 94% to 51% in the commercial population.
[Click to Enlarge]
These changes have crucial implications for pharmaceutical manufacturers’ channel strategies and for the specialty drug distributors that sell to physician offices.
…OR BEING PUSHED?
Economic pressures are (1) encouraging oncologists to sell their practices to hospitals, and (2) shifting care from community practices to hospital outpatient facilities. As I describe in New Data: How Outrageous Hospital Markups Hike Drug Spending, hospitals profit significantly from acquiring these practices. Hospitals can:
- Generate more revenue from specialty drug administration than can independent physician-owned clinics
- Purchase drugs at sharply discounted prices via the 340B Drug Pricing Program
Physician practices that administer the same drugs, however, could face dire financial consequences under the CMS experiment. Here’s what I told The Washington Post in This Controversial Rule Could Change How Doctors Profit From Using The Most Expensive Drugs:
"Physician offices could be crushed, which will accelerate physician consolidation into health systems—and likely raise healthcare costs as the mega system extracts more from payers," Adam Fein, president of Pembroke Consulting said in an e-mail.Five years ago, I predicted that buy-and-bill would continue to lose share due to the many forces of change aligned against the practice. (See June 2011’s The Future of Buy-and-Bill According to Payers and Oncology Practices.) At the time, I focused on specialty pharmacy fulfillment to healthcare providers, a.k.a., “white bagging.” Providers pushed back against payers and successfully slowed the growth of white bagging, partly to protect their drug administration profits.
Now, CMS looks set to finish the job and further shrink buy-and-bill in physician offices. Can anybody tell me what's wrong with this picture?