<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497.post5132923719289367583..comments</id><updated>2007-08-10T06:48:04.835-04:00</updated><category term='Channel Management'/><category term='Supply Chain Technology'/><category term='Blog Administration'/><category term='Importation'/><category term='Health Care Policy'/><category term='Group Purchasing Organizations (GPOs)'/><category term='Drug Shortages'/><category term='Industry Trends'/><category term='Fun Stuff'/><category term='PBMs'/><category term='Wholesalers'/><category term='Pharmacy Economics'/><category term='Pharmacy'/><category term='Supply Chain Humor'/><category term='Drug Counterfeiting'/><category term='Health Care Reform'/><category term='Pharmacogenomics'/><category term='Pedigree'/><category term='Specialty Drugs'/><category term='Medicare Part D'/><category term='Average Sales Price (ASP)'/><category term='Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs)'/><category term='Generic Drugs'/><category term='Guest Post'/><category term='Marketing'/><category term='RFID'/><category term='Average Acquisition Cost (AAC)'/><category term='International Drug Channels'/><category term='Enforcement'/><category term='Costs/Reimbursement'/><category term='Average Manufacturer Price (AMP)'/><category term='Mergers and Acquisitions'/><title type='text'>Comments on Drug Channels: More RFID Un-Hype</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.drugchannels.net/feeds/5132923719289367583/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/28450497/5132923719289367583/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.drugchannels.net/2007/05/more-rfid-un-hype.html'/><author><name>Adam J. Fein, Ph.D.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12217252282643255442</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='25' height='32' src='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_jauTfEtde80/TTnq9WCPzYI/AAAAAAAAAAM/VNKwcn8y_BA/s220/AdamJFein-DrugChannels.jpg'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>3</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497.post-3384520086051972405</id><published>2007-08-10T05:52:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-08-10T05:52:00.000-04:00</updated><title type='text'>In response to anon above, if the written ID is ti...</title><content type='html'>In response to anon above, if the written ID is tied to the TID in a dbase, the anti-counterfeting scheme works. The TID is not writable, ID's the make and model of the tag, along with a unique ID per tag and is done at the time of manufacture. Tie this to the written ID in a backend dbase and now a counterfeiter cannot duplicate this without buying a silicon processing machine and manufacturing their own tags. Oh ya, they would also need access to the dbase to make the associations right wouldn't they.....</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/28450497/5132923719289367583/comments/default/3384520086051972405'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/28450497/5132923719289367583/comments/default/3384520086051972405'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.drugchannels.net/2007/05/more-rfid-un-hype.html?showComment=1186739520000#c3384520086051972405' title=''/><author><name>Subject Matter Expert</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.drugchannels.net/2007/05/more-rfid-un-hype.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497.post-5132923719289367583' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/28450497/posts/default/5132923719289367583' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-1631421822'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497.post-6919176011249459991</id><published>2007-05-30T14:56:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-05-30T14:56:00.000-04:00</updated><title type='text'>I can't imagine why a RFID tag would be any impedi...</title><content type='html'>I can't imagine why a RFID tag would be any impediment to counterfeiters.  It has been a well discussed issue that RFID tags are easily acquired and programmed with real serial numbers. If retagged product is placed one step ahead in the supply chain (by say holding the real product in a warehouse), counterfeiters can authenticate fakes, and send the real products for testing.  &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Counterfeiters don't have to even access a database, or break open containers, to acquire the serial numbers.  The numbers can be obtained using RFID much-touted lack of line-of-site requirement. Say, read an entire shipping container at sea, transmit the serial numbers via satellite, and before the container makes it to land, it could be considered fake by border patrols.   &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;RFID expert Michael Guillory does a nice job of explaining the process on the AIM website.  There are also many instructional videos on the web - even for more encrypted RFID like your car keys.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/28450497/5132923719289367583/comments/default/6919176011249459991'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/28450497/5132923719289367583/comments/default/6919176011249459991'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.drugchannels.net/2007/05/more-rfid-un-hype.html?showComment=1180551360000#c6919176011249459991' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.drugchannels.net/2007/05/more-rfid-un-hype.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497.post-5132923719289367583' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/28450497/posts/default/5132923719289367583' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-923906484'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497.post-7510728388047633969</id><published>2007-05-14T13:23:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2007-05-14T13:23:00.000-04:00</updated><title type='text'>Myth#1 RFID as Anti-counterfeiting Device.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;...</title><content type='html'>Myth#1 RFID as Anti-counterfeiting Device.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I don't hear the RFID industry or Pharma industry saying RFID was a type of anti-counterfeiting or security device.  There is big difference between using RFID as an enabler to a more safe and secure supply chain vs. indicating that tags alone is a security device.  A lock is of no use if its not attached to a door to a frame to a building.&lt;BR/&gt;RFID is only a component to safe and secure supply chain.  A system of laws, regulations, business practices, systems, penalities, and enforcement must work together with RFID is needed. &lt;BR/&gt;Myth#2 RFID needed for Track and Trace. &lt;BR/&gt;A unique identification system (serialization)applied to all levels of packaging is needed for track and trace system.  Other data carriers will work to deliver unique identification, but these "line of sight" data carriers provides no additional hurdles for counterfeiters.  We want to make it more difficult for them to introduce bad product into the supply chain.   Again, its a "system" of activities needed to ensure a safe supply chain.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/28450497/5132923719289367583/comments/default/7510728388047633969'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/28450497/5132923719289367583/comments/default/7510728388047633969'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.drugchannels.net/2007/05/more-rfid-un-hype.html?showComment=1179163380000#c7510728388047633969' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.drugchannels.net/2007/05/more-rfid-un-hype.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497.post-5132923719289367583' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/28450497/posts/default/5132923719289367583' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-1050200564'/></entry></feed>
