<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497.post2036802060592169540..comments</id><updated>2010-02-09T19:57:52.026-05:00</updated><category term='Channel Management'/><category term='Supply Chain Technology'/><category term='Blog Administration'/><category term='Importation'/><category term='Health Care Policy'/><category term='Group Purchasing Organizations (GPOs)'/><category term='Drug Shortages'/><category term='Industry Trends'/><category term='Fun Stuff'/><category term='PBMs'/><category term='Wholesalers'/><category term='Pharmacy Economics'/><category term='Pharmacy'/><category term='Supply Chain Humor'/><category term='Drug Counterfeiting'/><category term='Health Care Reform'/><category term='Pharmacogenomics'/><category term='Pedigree'/><category term='Specialty Drugs'/><category term='Medicare Part D'/><category term='Average Sales Price (ASP)'/><category term='Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs)'/><category term='Generic Drugs'/><category term='Guest Post'/><category term='Marketing'/><category term='RFID'/><category term='Average Acquisition Cost (AAC)'/><category term='International Drug Channels'/><category term='Enforcement'/><category term='Costs/Reimbursement'/><category term='Average Manufacturer Price (AMP)'/><category term='Mergers and Acquisitions'/><title type='text'>Comments on Drug Channels: Pharmacists Haggle over Pedigree Costs</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.drugchannels.net/feeds/2036802060592169540/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/28450497/2036802060592169540/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.drugchannels.net/2008/05/pharmacists-haggle-over-pedigree-costs.html'/><author><name>Adam J. Fein, Ph.D.</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/12217252282643255442</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='25' height='32' src='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_jauTfEtde80/TTnq9WCPzYI/AAAAAAAAAAM/VNKwcn8y_BA/s220/AdamJFein-DrugChannels.jpg'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>3</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497.post-4006985353256810352</id><published>2008-05-20T15:07:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-05-20T15:07:00.000-04:00</updated><title type='text'>here's something that I don't get:  who owns all o...</title><content type='html'>here's something that I don't get:  who owns all of this data?  That's where the money is.  I'm guessing that pharmacists want to keep the data from scanning a pedigree and get paid for it.  Anyone know what CA was planning about data from the pharmacy?</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/28450497/2036802060592169540/comments/default/4006985353256810352'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/28450497/2036802060592169540/comments/default/4006985353256810352'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.drugchannels.net/2008/05/pharmacists-haggle-over-pedigree-costs.html?showComment=1211310420000#c4006985353256810352' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.drugchannels.net/2008/05/pharmacists-haggle-over-pedigree-costs.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497.post-2036802060592169540' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/28450497/posts/default/2036802060592169540' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-133752204'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497.post-3786895774865979115</id><published>2008-05-20T15:00:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-05-20T15:00:00.000-04:00</updated><title type='text'>It will be interesting to see where manufacturers ...</title><content type='html'>It will be interesting to see where manufacturers fall out HR 5839.  The bill does a nice job of remembering who pays the lobbyist's bill.  Manufacturers are removed from the ePedigree process and likely, the liability associated with ePedigree.  California, of course, made no such concession.  &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;However, when you break down the State requirements, there really aren't 40 different standards.  Generally, there are four models which is a managable number.  &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;The bigger question is WHO has the capability to police the data.  The FDA seems an unlikely, and unwilling, participant.  So, if the Feds can't do the final follow-through, the States should be allowed to protect their citizens.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Until HR 5839 is resolved, nothing will get done.  Everyone is waiting to see what Washington will do.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/28450497/2036802060592169540/comments/default/3786895774865979115'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/28450497/2036802060592169540/comments/default/3786895774865979115'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.drugchannels.net/2008/05/pharmacists-haggle-over-pedigree-costs.html?showComment=1211310000000#c3786895774865979115' title=''/><author><name>Jon</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.drugchannels.net/2008/05/pharmacists-haggle-over-pedigree-costs.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497.post-2036802060592169540' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/28450497/posts/default/2036802060592169540' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-1892717809'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497.post-1521392329481376520</id><published>2008-05-20T12:14:00.000-04:00</published><updated>2008-05-20T12:14:00.000-04:00</updated><title type='text'>I wanted to write saying that I appreciated the co...</title><content type='html'>I wanted to write saying that I appreciated the coverage and analysis you’re providing with respect to ePedigree / Serialization in California as well as the pending federal legislation.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;In terms of ease of implementation as well as mitigation of risk, I don’t believe that there is any question that one set of standards and processes is better than 34. Much of the media coverage and legislative pressure has been on manufacturers and their efforts to comply, specifically with California’s law, however because of the way ePedigree works, entities closer to the dispensing pharmacy in the supply chain actually have more information. Because of this, they  potentially will receive more attention from enforcement once this is completely implemented. From the manufacturing perspective, the entire process is a far-reaching one – needing integration to many parts of an IT and process infrastructure – as well as a costly one to serialize and manage.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/28450497/2036802060592169540/comments/default/1521392329481376520'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/28450497/2036802060592169540/comments/default/1521392329481376520'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.drugchannels.net/2008/05/pharmacists-haggle-over-pedigree-costs.html?showComment=1211300040000#c1521392329481376520' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.drugchannels.net/2008/05/pharmacists-haggle-over-pedigree-costs.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-28450497.post-2036802060592169540' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/28450497/posts/default/2036802060592169540' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-2083718449'/></entry></feed>
